Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, the improvement in technology leads to various environmental troubles. While some people believe that we should live simpler to prevent this problem, I would argue that technology advantage is a good solution to resolve environmental problems.
On the one hand, living simpler is necessary to create a better environment. Firstly, since people using modern vehicles, they create a lot of emissions which lead to air pollution. For example, if people walk or use bike cycles instead of motorbikes or cars this pollution might do not happen. Secondly, because of the rapid development of technology, people now consume natural resources more than before. As a result, natural resources might be exhausted.
On the other hand, I believe technology can greatly contribute to environmental protection. Firstly, because of those improvements, people now can use solar energy to generate power. Therefore, it is not necessary to rely on non-renewable resources and people can create electricity without significantly damaging the environment. Secondly, due to solar energy, people could develop eco-friendly transports that use fresh energy sources such as wind, solar. As a result, air pollution might be reduced.
In conclusion, while development technology has several advantages, I firmly believe that its advantages are greater.
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 56
- Some people think that individuals are born to be leaders others believe leadership can be learnt Discuss both views and give your opinion 63
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1995 and 2002, and projections for 2050 67
- The charts below show what UK graduate and post graduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 67
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 201.0 315.596192385 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71144278607 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1484716044 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626865671642 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4417869221 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3076923077 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4615384615 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258516515823 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888651776155 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908571613877 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172531149617 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107719090354 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.