Experience is more effective way to teach compared to books agree and disagree?
The importance of the experience is more effective way to teach compared to books, which has always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and against it, thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of imitating celebrities has sparked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that the integral part the upside of imitating celebrities are instrumental indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. This essay will be elaborate and provide a well-weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the is more effective way to teach compared to book is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that advantage. Therefore, it is vital time to appreciate both the significance of the more effective way to teach compared to books for the amelioration of society.
However, it has some various who choose to think different differently and hold an opposing the viewpoint. Which can certainly overwhelm substantial influence of the more effective way to teach compared to books? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that disadvantage. Hence, it is apparent that the download of the more effective way to teach compared to books cannot be ignored.
The above-presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of the more effectively way to teach compared to books? While it is evident it has benefits, although its deleterious effect cannot be ignored
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-08-15 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
- machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and there is on prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people 77
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 55
- How to control the rapidly growing population in the cities and the necessary measures to be taken to control it. 85
- Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year, what are the cause of this crucial problem? what are the solutions? 65
- some people think that it is good to lay out for leisure time activities and other think that there is no need for any outlining 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'upsurged'.
Suggestion: upsurged
...which has always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and agains...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...s always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and against it, t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...arked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the socie...
^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...isadvantage. Hence, it is apparent that the download of the more effective way to teach comp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.264 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17511322633 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8662740611 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.515959568113 0.242375264174 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189332709463 0.0925447433944 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17570007449 0.071462118173 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327155338815 0.151781067708 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843207114967 0.0609392437508 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.