The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens
Democracy is a type of government formed by the people by casting votes for the representatives of the various political parties. After Monarch democracy came into play in majority of the regions around the world. Eliminating the hierarchy of ruling, every citizen is given a right to choose their leader. This way even a common man can choose a leader, who he believes to work for his cause and serve the country well. I agree that the effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Firstly, the whole idea of democracy was to ensure that someone who is running the country should have a brief understanding of economic, cultural and social circumstances of the respective region. To get a peripheral view of the condition of a country and effectiveness of the leader’s one may turn to the citizens for a central view. For instance, if the economic condition of the majority of the population is adverse, one could easily predict that the leaders of the government are at fault. Meaning, the declining economy of the country indicates that the leaders are either incapable of serving the country or are too lazy to take action. Further, we have seen all around the globe that a country flourishes under righteous and active leaders who work well for their citizens.
Secondly, if the effectiveness of the leader's is to be examined what better way is there to dig into the well-being of the layman? The highest authority, the government and its leaders are solely responsible for the ups and downs in a country. The leaders make all the important international, national and regional decisions of their country which affects the day to day lives of the population of the country. People of a country rely on their leaders to make sound decisions in favor of progress of the country with a promise of a harmonious life. The fact that a country's leaders play a vital role in the conditions of the country is inexorable. Concluding, whatever the decisions that are made by the leaders affect the well-being of the citizens.
One may argue that sometimes even when leaders are good, there are external situation that may impact the well-being of its citizens like a natural disaster or a terrorist attack. Although, the leaders are responsible for what happens afterwards. The decisions they make, the measures they follow and these are the major situation when a leader’s abilities are tested. Mostly the contribution of the leader is measured in terms of how the people have enhanced their way of living by fulfilling basic needs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | priyanayak | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | yesh | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Dikshaa_007 | 50 | view |
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council. "An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby 16
- Traffic on roads has become a problem in nearly every country in the world What can be done to reduce the amount of traffic at a society level and at an individual level 72
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the managing director of the Exeunt Theater Company:“Now that we have moved to a larger theater, we can expect to increase our revenues from ticket sales. To further increase profits, we should start pro 64
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 66
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tives of the various political parties. After Monarch democracy came into play in maj...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'situations'?
Suggestion: situations
...en leaders are good, there are external situation that may impact the well-being of its c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95890410959 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88039555466 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465753424658 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6273615719 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.6 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39930894818 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135022682999 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132159337427 0.0758088955206 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261113651956 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738902139182 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.