The traffic congestion has increased massively across the globe. The government has proposed a solution to raise the taxes to reduce the traffic jam. What is your view on this?
Recently, raising the taxes for traffic congestion reduction has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the advantages and disadvantages of it?". Whereas it is a widely held view that some people think this solution is effective, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the environment standpoint, traffic jam is bound up inextricably with air pollution, which indicates it leads to both stained street and nature damage. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between new policy and traffic congestion as well as an exponential increase in human health. Their academic criticism was impressive. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of government plan is correlated positively with not only raising taxes but also tough regulation.
Within the realm of transportation, without the slightest doubt, public transportation attribute to bus, in that it would come down to less traffic, less anxiety, and less stressful lifestyle. A salient example of such attribution is modern car, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take private transport for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint household income and economic consequences problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to new road, driving license, and even restriction on pedestrian. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of private investment in transporting projects.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that disadvantages of it far outweigh its advantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-04 | yasamin.gharib62 | 79 | view |
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, or to increase knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- Some environmentalists claim that people who drive cars do not have a right to complain about pollution since cars also pollute. What is your opinion? 11
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the environment standpoint, traffic...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 409, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...heir academic criticism was impressive. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g taxes but also tough regulation. Within the realm of transportation, with...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vestment in transporting projects. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75510204082 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20518634277 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690476190476 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6526147609 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.153846154 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183169452699 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047926385164 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548029659295 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10460190372 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868885656989 0.0609392437508 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.