Positive And Negative Effects Of Technology Information Through Mass Media
It is widely held belief that mass media plays a vital role in spreading information and news. There is also a counter argument that mass media also can become vast source of rumors. However, I believe this topic must be well debated before concluding.
There are two types communication associated with Mass Media. One is electronic media and the other is print media. Items like newspaper, magazines etc, form print media. Devices like TV, mobile, and news over internet or radio channels are examples of electronic media. Considering wide spectrum of channels opened to public today, such as, Facebook, Twitter, Whatsapp, anyone can post anything and create fake news. This is the biggest negative effect we are experiencing today. This possibility was very less around 20 years back, where opportunity to spread information or news was in hands of only some firms such as TV channels and newspapers. Government could control those firms with defined policies and norms. Owing to which, newspaper reading was considered as a very good habit and was taught as discipline.
In today's internet era, such controls and their violations are very difficult aspects for government to manage. And the result is confusion among public to differentiate genuine news with fake news.
From all the details brought up above, I am of the view that every mode to media or mobile application or social media websites are invented for great cause and good intention. We should understand its right purpose and use it accordingly to create a positive impact on society.
In conclusion, I recommend government must fight misuse of mass media by including a chapter on right usage of Mass Media in schools. It should also hi-light what are the outcomes of misusing these tools. This way the future generations understand mass media's value and use it appropriately.
- University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 84
- sdghda 11
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or a curse 56
- Belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 78
- It is usually foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established in a good job Do you agree or disagree 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.48453608247 227% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 5.05154639175 317% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 937.175257732 167% => OK
No of words: 303.0 206.0 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16171617162 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69759536836 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 127.690721649 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617161716172 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 290.88556701 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.13402061856 99% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6804123711 150% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6400129954 44.8134815571 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3157894737 76.5299724578 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9473684211 16.8248392259 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36842105263 4.34317383033 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247411274729 0.216113520407 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727612873945 0.0766984524023 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700369656968 0.0603063233224 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121872078003 0.12726935374 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067434710156 0.0580467560999 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 8.37731958763 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 41.2886597938 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 8.62886597938 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.8426966292 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.75 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.