Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.
People are raised as a member of their family and society from their childhood. Children who are often given the opportunities to choose their everyday matters like food, clothes etc, it is possible that they will think about their own wishes in general, even when they grow up. While important decision making can help them to be self-reliant, it is not always beneficial, for both children and the society.
Children are inexperienced in a lot of things, including the matters that involve them directly, like food, clothes, entertainment etc. If they are allowed to choose their own food or clothes, it is very likely to result in some kind of negative impact over them. Children are not aware of many things that can affect them badly. For example, if children are allowed to choose their own food, they will most probably choose junk foods like ice cream, pizza etc which are harmful to their health. So things like these should fall upon the adults, who are aware of potential consequences of a certain decision.
By letting children choose what they want may also raise them as individuals who are only concerned about their own priorities over others. This kind of characteristic is not desirable at all as a social creature. Children should grow up as empathetic individuals to others, which is one of the most important human characteristics.
On the other hand, some people say that allowing children to make decisions concerning them is important. The logic behind this concept might be that children will not hesitate their own decisions as future adults. This might be true in some cases, but those aspects should be chosen carefully. Children may be allowed to make their own decisions in order to teach them self responsibility, but not always. Otherwise there may be a possibility that they will grow up as uncontrollable autocrats who are harmful to both the society and to themselves.
Therefore, children should be allowed to choose their everyday matters to some extent, which still should be under the supervision of adults, so the proper purpose can be served.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | aghasaeed | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Noah1997 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Noah1997 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | eslamyousry | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | hungdung2507 | 61 | view |
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
- Some experts believe that it is better fof children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. 56
- Governments should spend money in railways rather than roads. 56
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- More and more people are opting for readymade food instead of freshly cooked food.does this practicr has more advantages than disadvantages. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to junk'
Suggestion: to junk
...wn food, they will most probably choose junk foods like ice cream, pizza etc which a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...teach them self responsibility, but not always. Otherwise there may be a possibility t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...em self responsibility, but not always. Otherwise there may be a possibility that they wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in general, kind of, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00286532951 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.721788555 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498567335244 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7737024288 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.705882353 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364486116511 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124202074012 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860114652409 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210453786004 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741096135233 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.