The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012.
The illustration delineates the total school spending on each gender between 2000 and 2012 while the distribution of students who achieved higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore in 2000 and 2012.
In general, the amount of money investing in school increased gradually every year. According to the pie chart, the percentage of students gaining higher education diplomas and degrees showed a considerable gap from 2000 to 2012.
In the bar chart, the spending on school boys and girls showed a similar pattern of steady growth. In 2000, the amount of money used for men was slight than that of women, which was 9 million and 7 million respectively. The figure for males continued its rising trend, which was double that of females about 26 million in 2008 before reaching a peak of nearly 35 million in 2012. However, the allocation for females remained constant at 13 million in 2008, rising to 20 million in 2012.
In the pie chart, there was a significant gap in the proportion of graduates with diplomas and degrees, which was 73% for students who graduated with diplomas, triple that of those with degrees. In 2012, the figures for those slightly changed, accounting for 68% for graduates gaining diplomas compared to 32% for those with degrees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-01 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-01 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 78 | view |
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people 78
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topicFresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem.What are the causes of the in 56
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02369668246 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62034310234 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521327014218 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9345142965 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.777777778 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357596286007 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156686642786 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176973022822 0.0843802449381 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266519149601 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167907386597 0.0819641961636 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.