It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skill than people who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree?
It is convinced that people who are interested in reading have better imaginations and language skill than people who prefer tellies. While it is clear that there is an abundant amount of TV programmes which seem to be more excited than books, I totally agree with the topic’s point of view
Firstly, from the perspective of human creativity, while it is clear that films have many visual objects, works of literature force us to use our own imagination. Consequently, although people spend excitedly their leisure time on broadcast program, books stimulate our creativity better than ready-made contents on the telly. For example, one of the famous works of literary fiction which is named “Two Thousand Miles Under The Sea” describes an adventure of the characters under the sea. The story continuously broadens audiences’ literary horizons through the awesome description of mysterious creatures under the ocean.
Secondly, in terms of linguistic improvements, if we fall into the habit of reading, books will enrich our range of vocabulary and perfect the way we use them, this is really an incredible benefit which television programmes do not have. For instance, when we enjoy a book, an enormous amount of words are used in many different contexts, and therefore, reading actually provides us with more new words. In addition, reading habit increases the ability of reading over our own written works and even helps us practice meticulousness.
In conclusion, many people believe that reading habit boosts human imaginations and language skill than watching TV. I totally agree with this, and therefore, I think parents should encourage children’s literary appreciation, especially by bedtime stories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | quynhan1995 | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | quynhan1995 | 67 | view |
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 84
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012. 67
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- The diagram shows the process of producing smoked fish 89
- The plan below shows a typical American and Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gree with the topic's point of view Firstly, from the perspective of human c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...an enormous amount of words are used in many different contexts, and therefore, reading actual...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47955390335 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00192721503 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624535315985 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.6831113243 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.4 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.4 7.06120827912 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267824780759 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115528339822 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153651811482 0.0667982634062 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187670549607 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138740854285 0.056905535591 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.