Some people think that all university student should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Education and method of it are an issue which cause many discontents among people. As, some people believe universities should give freedom to their students in choosing curriculums while others strongly opposite with this idea. It gives me the sense that debates led nowhere fruitful since people split on this issue, so in the subsequent paragraphs, I articulate both viewpoints and their reasons.
The first group of people reasoned that university students are not mature enough to have freedom in choosing subject for study and it is university duty to do this for them and prepare them for their future work. Also, it should be noted that they evidenced unemployment as a serious consequence which causes throughout this freedom, that is partly because of critical amount of university roles in the industries and economic conditions.
With these in mind, other strongly disagree with his idea and acclaimed that student need soft skills as well as hard skills which can be learn in university. If university gives obligatory courses to students and occupies all their free times, they cannot learn soft skills, such as self-management or team working which are essential for their future life and work and it may be reason for unemployment among youth by elated academic background which definitely shed light on false assumption of other group of people.
To wrap it up, in the previous paragraphs I elaborated two viewpoints and their probable reason but in my personal viewpoint, both of them , together are right to some extent, first of all, there must be resolute courses for students to develop their hard skills for their future profession and universities must set some optional courses for students in regard to develop their soft skills once developing both types of skills can help students to get access to large reservoirs of opportunities in their life.
- the chart below sows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries. 84
- LIFE TODAY IS BETTER AND COMFORTABLE THAN PST.DO YOU AGREE OD DISAGREE ABOUT THIS IDEA? 60
- DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE. IN 20 YEARS LATER THERE WILL BE FEWER CAR IN USE? 66
- the chart below shows the different levels of post school qualification in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 67
- people today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ch cause many discontents among people. As, some people believe universities shoul...
^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to subject'
Suggestion: to subject
...ture enough to have freedom in choosing subject for study and it is university duty to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t in my personal viewpoint, both of them , together are right to some extent, firs...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, while, such as, as well as, first of all, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71194108569 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.2975951904 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.552535193 49.4020404114 262% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 197.625 106.682146367 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.25 20.7667163134 184% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.375 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193201048665 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888604374239 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565568214767 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123165906415 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363925502417 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 13.0946893788 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.1190380762 170% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.