A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
prompt states that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. As good as it sounds in terms of stability and making concepts robust, it is as bad strategy. This decision depends on multiple scenarios and current situations. If prompts has those understanding applicable in the scenarios then it is a good idea with a little variety in some of the subjects.
First of all, as the Chinese proverb subjects, it is good to have knowledge in all field but becoming master is having idiosyncratic characteristics. But it is not true in all situations. For hypothetical e.g. the world is going through global warming, and imagine the climate is exacerbating and on the verge of becoming hostile for living beings. In such scenario if you are having subjects that are far from the field linked to help resolve the catastrophic situation is just deviating from the main point. Having subjects for a semester or two makes sense but having the similar subjects throughout the school is not germane to situations.
Secondly, having similar subjects are not adding values in some subjects if pertained over and over. What it means is, for e.g if you are providing history as a subject throughout the school years, hardly makes sense as the history is not going to change - learning it once is better for understanding and learning from it. If the student wants to achieve their career in the History field, they may choose their career path in that field after school. It is a better suggested to have a subject repeated in an interval semesters rather just repeating in every semester, which is apt, because it will allow one to brush up the concepts that may have been forgotten since its first appearance and study. So rather than taking firm decision to allow all subjects repeat throughout the school until they enter college, it is highly recommended to strategize it in a way so that students can take full advantage of school and at the same time explore other concepts of the world as well.
Finally, having constant exposure to similar things/concepts makes concepts robust, but it is filled with the risks of stemming the knowledge of students. Students should have options on their own to select few subjects that they are interested in and may explore more into it as a primary subjects. Rest other subjects could be fixed by the faculty every year/semester which are basic needs, such a math, science, native/global language etc. For e.g. If in a school I had an option to learn about astronomy as a separate subject that derives from Physics, faculty can select Physics as a fixed subject and Astronomy related subject as a elective.
To conclude, it may sound an idea of having similar national curriculum, it is also suggested that it should be versatile or a combination of fixed and elective subjects. Having a stronger base of knowledge is highly acceptable and appreciable but it leads the risk of limiting the knowledge to only those subjects, where students in that age are malleable and easily grasping things, hence they should be exposed to variety of subjects and few fixed subjects which are important to enter in the real world after school. As it is said - with the available resources in a technology savvy world, one may need an ability to understand and idea to know what to look for. To have that to happen one may need to have knowledge in all fields, and when required, depth of particular field can be achieved through passion and intelligence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Prompt
prompt states that a nation should require all...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tiple scenarios and current situations. If prompts has those understanding applica...
^^
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...is a good idea with a little variety in some of the subjects. First of all, as the Chi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 469, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested having'.
Suggestion: suggested having
...that field after school. It is a better suggested to have a subject repeated in an interval semes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 637, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ubject and Astronomy related subject as a elective. To conclude, it may soun...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., finally, first, hence, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2950.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 605.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87603305785 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95951083803 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72378456537 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451239669421 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 911.7 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5605635861 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.090909091 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209602247343 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753124502493 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185369357338 0.0758088955206 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146308518682 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143107297566 0.0667264976115 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.