Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, travelling is a popular way to spend vacations, owing to it has become more affordable over time. Whether it is more advisable doing it in groups with a guide or not, though, is a matter of intense debate. As far as I am concerned, I totally agree with that idea. this position is based on two main reasons that will be analyzed thoroughly below.
Firstly, using a local guide and travelling accompanied with others tourists make your trip more enjoyable. Normally, guides have prepared a schedule in advance, with a route that include places of interest that you should stop by, order to know more about the culture and the history of that place. On the other hand, if you go on your own, probably you have to spend a valuable time answering questions like, which places should I go?, how to arrive there?, that are already solved using a tourism agency. For example, two weeks ago I travelled to Mexico city with three friends, in our second trip to that country. this time was broadly more memorable than the first one, due to we hired a local person that helped us to create an itinerary with remarkable places of that city. even when this time we were there less time than the first one, we were able to visit the ancient city of Teotihuacan, the Garibaldi Park, the Central Market and many other amazing places that we out of our previous trip.
Secondly, to walk around a country that you unknown, could end up be quite dangerous for your safety. if you do not know enough about the place that you are visiting, you could fairly find problems and become a pleasant trip intro an awful anecdote. Exist many aspects that could work against you in a situation like that, such as ignore about the local customs, the language barrier, racism, or even historical or religious differences. An illustrative example of that was my brother John journey to the Miami last year. we are from cuba, a socialist country with an ancient ideological difference with the USA. In the 90s, a significant number of people who disagree with the cuban moved out the country and established in that city. To make a long history short, due to my brother lacked of information about the political environment there, he started to emit political opinions that bothered many people there. As a result, he had to cut his trip and come back earlier, because he faced many uncomfortable moments there.
In summation, I am of the opinion that making tourism in a new place it is more prudent do it with more people and a native guide. this is owing to it is more safety, and you will be able to take advance of your time more efficiently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Pakshid | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | 2507575150 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Chara | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 70
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...cerned, I totally agree with that idea. this position is based on two main reasons t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 619, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ds, in our second trip to that country. this time was broadly more memorable than th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 782, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...ry with remarkable places of that city. even when this time we were there less time ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... up be quite dangerous for your safety. if you do not know enough about the place ...
^^
Line 13, column 523, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...er John journey to the Miami last year. we are from cuba, a socialist country with...
^^
Line 17, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...it with more people and a native guide. this is owing to it is more safety, and you ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67094017094 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47736760387 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534188034188 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9660705421 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.3 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190196071492 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585927794646 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378046911118 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115316687824 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214228987651 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.