In some countries, the criminal trials are shown on the TV and the general public can watch them. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There is much lively debate about whether it is an appropriate approach to present the criminal trials to the public through television. Some people argue that this is a negative development. However, this essay will argue why the pros of such progress overweigh the cons.
On the one hand, the judgement to criminals through a television programme has presented a trend of positive development. To begin with, this sort of TV show provide the truth of crime with informative details. This helps people to have access to knowledge about what they interested such as the law or policy. Secondly, these trials open to the public will decrease the crime rate to a certain extent because people will be informed of the consequence they have to face if commit a crime. Furthermore, people will acquire more knowledge about some particular crime and learning some preventable skills. For instance, the increasing number of elderly scam has become a serious problem, if these people would watch more criminal trials related to the scam, then their damage may be avoidable.
On the other hand, the criminal judgement face to the people in public will trigger some negative consequence. Some people argue that some potential criminals may break the law by copy the crime that they have learnt from television. From my counter-argument of this statement, if these people intended to commit a crime, they would found any information they need in this digital era. Another reason often mentioned is that the privacy of victims will be exposed and considered as a second hurt. However, according to recently advanced technology, the victim's face and voice could be change when they showed on TV.
In conclusion, this essay has argued both sides of the criminal judgement on TV, although there is some minor influence on the public, such TV show played an important role in current society. Personally, I strongly believe the benefits to the public overweigh the negative development.
- Some people say the government should give health care the first priorities some others believe there are more important priorities to spend the taxpayers money Discuss both views and give your own opinion 69
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- When new towns are planned, it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 87
- Some people regard the increasing business and cultural contact between countries as a positive development. Others, however, feel these leading to loss of national identities. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13888888889 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71155632855 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5815779339 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156871399569 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577421153964 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465205252845 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113455986657 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237097959591 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.