Today, much attention has been drawn to the phenomenon that graduates who have just entered the workforce being criticized as lacking social skills. In this essay, the factors responsible for this problem will be discussed and feasible solutions will be proposed accordingly.
There are several factors contributing to this issue. First of all, this problem can be attributed to the fact that new employees, when they were in schools, had no time and energy to develop their social skills because they were forced to concentrate on studies. Secondly, this problem is also exacerbated by awareness. To be specific, teenagers pay little attention to interpersonal techniques improvement. They believe it is their academic performance that determines their career prospects rather than the capability about how to get along well with others. Therefore, they don’t participate in group activities such as football or basketball which are helpful to enhance relationships.
Accordingly, the solutions to this issue are also varied. To begin with, it is suggested that schools and parents should give more time to students to socialize. ( interpersonal skills are important to people’s life, by giving less homework, students can have more time to make friends and play with them, which will help them improve social skills that are needed in the future. ) In addition, another necessary approach is that students should be informed of the importance of social skills as soon as possible. Only in this way would they make a conscious effort to get involved in some team activities to acquire this skillset. For example, students could take part in some volunteer work, during which they will learn how to communicate with others and how to work closely with teammates.
In conclusion, various factors caused these new employees’ shortage of communication skills. But I believe if they can carry out the measures mentioned above, they will be able to address the problem in the foreseeable future.
- Television has changed the quality of life for an ordinary person. Do you agree or disagree ??? 11
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skills than people who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 90
- Some people believe that is better to live and work in a vertical city with multiple tall buildings, as compared to an horizontal city with fewer tall buildings. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 74
- Some people say that with the development of modern technology printed books newspapers and magazines lose their importance To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 82
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management, work and interpersonal skills. To what extent do you agree or disa 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'techniques'' or 'technique's'?
Suggestion: techniques'; technique's
...s pay little attention to interpersonal techniques improvement. They believe it is their a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Interpersonal
...ve more time to students to socialize. interpersonal skills are important to people's l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36392405063 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91190660016 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591772151899 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5177187347 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9375 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4375 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229315814417 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688155969607 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287021174767 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122479371305 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340118321141 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.