Task 2: Some employers find that their new employees lack in basic interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team. What are the causes of this problem? Suggest solutions
Working harmoniously with others is an important skill every employee, new and old alike, should possess in order to contribute to the company’s growth. However, in many workplaces, newly hired staff are having a hard time dealing well with others and this scenario often leads to low performance. In addressing this, managers should first dig its causes and employ appropriate solutions.
Generally speaking, a person’s inability to work well with others is caused by differences in personality and lack of training. Every person has a different personality and one that hinders social growth is introversion which sometimes results in seclusion or separation from the group. Another reason is lack of training. While differences in personality are unavoidable, managing them is possible. That is why personality development, a subject aiming to capacitate students to bring out the best in them, work well with others and grow in all aspects by matching the right personality with the situation, is taught in most courses.
In enhancing newbies’ interpersonal skills, peer-mentoring and team-building activities can be of great help. Peer mentoring or having neophytes work with the experienced ones will give them the opportunity to build rapport. Moreover, team-building activities aiming to enhance camaraderie, cooperation, and collaboration among employee, in my opinion, is another good remedy for both personality problem and lack of training. During such activities, employees are given the chance to mingle both with their colleagues and bosses, which is helpful in understanding and finding beauty in their differences to become an effective team.
Summing up, it is important to enhance employees’ interpersonal skills. In doing this, managers should recognize that differences in personality and lack of training can hinder the goal. However, peer mentoring and team building activities are good solutions that can address the issues.
- Today people are surrounded by all kinds of advertising. This affects what people think is important and has a negative impact on people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Task 2: in some countries, some criminal trials in law courts are shown on the television for the public.Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Nowadays, many animal species are becoming extinct. Some people believe that countries and individuals must solve this problem, others believe that humans beings are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The charts show the distribution of employment among agriculture industry CN and services in three countries in 1980 and 2020 85
- Task 2 Some employers find that their new employees lack in basic interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes of this problem Suggest solutions 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69256756757 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25504609104 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584459459459 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3992352259 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.3125 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0625 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249164635745 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810897868238 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448351897587 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144732804618 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408180234591 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.