In recent years, the ever-growing refugees have become a global issue, and it is argued that some developed countries are held responsible for accepting these refugees. However, from the point where I stand, I disagree with this view.
It is true that some rich countries like Sweden, America and the British are wealthy and are able to take in more people from other countries. In these new places, refugees can have access to clean water, basic food and health care for free, allowing them to embark on a new life.
However, the increase in refugees’ population never stops. Actually, it is poverty, war, political unrest or sometimes natural disaster that drives people to escape from their hometown. Developed countries cannot solve the refugee crisis only by opening the door to them, and it is also unrealistic for industrialised countries to do so all the time. But the advantaged countries could be helpful by offering development aid to the disadvantaged group. For example, developed countries can construct schools, hospitals and other infrastructure in poor areas, through which children there can study hard to get rid of the poverty circle, all people can get proper treatment when they fall ill, thus improving their living standard.
On the other hand, it will pose a negative impact on their own citizens if developed countries are held responsible for accommodating mass immigrants. We should realize that the government only has a limited amount of funding which mostly comes from taxpayers, so it imposes a financial burden on original dwellers if the government needs to take care of the increased population, which I believe poses a threat to the country’s stability and development. And to those refugees, I am afraid they may end up suffering racism and begging on the streets of the new country because they cannot speak the local language.
In conclusion, solving the root cause of the outbreaks of refugees is a far better way than allowing them freely immigrate to developed countries.
- Today, people in many countries choose to work and live wherever they like thanks to communication and transportation technologies. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- One of the major problems facing the world today is the growing number of refugees The developed nations in the world should tackle this problem by taking in more refugees To what extent do you agree with this opinion 91
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management, work and interpersonal skills. To what extent do you agree or disa 73
- In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new homes and office buildings, and people can build houses in their own style. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a situation? 89
- Many people believe that social networking sites have had had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, i am afraid, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17575757576 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85251166048 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609090909091 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8125679996 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.384615385 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0851610754035 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318498255167 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286070738757 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0522229399898 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394693523405 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.