Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Determining whether leadership can be learned or it is a natural skill, is an important matter. Knowing this would help educational and governmental organizations to decide if they can train someone to be a good leader or it is waste of time. Some people may think that leaders are born to be leaders while other would disagree. In my opinion though some individuals have this ability naturally, but it can be achieved as well. I think this way because of two important reasons.
The main reason is that the leaders have specific psychological characteristics which can be imitated and learned. Like every role in society, leaders have some specifications such as discipline and charisma in common which makes them a leader. According to an article I have read, almost every psychological characteristics can be imitated. Everyone can learn to behave and react in specific ways which will gradually make him to gain a desired specification. For example, one of my friends was used to get angry very fast. He was somehow born in this way and his biology leads him to be in this way. Once, I recommended him to consult with a psychiatrist who give him some special trainings and asked him to do certain tasks when he gets angry. These trainings helped my friend to become a calm person which surprised everyone. This experience taught me that psychological characteristics are achievable which can help someone to be leader.
The other reason is that I think that everything can be learned by experience. With exposure to different situations, one learns different things. When someone work or act as a leader or in his place, he encounters with different problems in which he acts in certain way and as a result, faces with its positive and negative consequences. Hence, this experiences would help him to learn how to react and behave in a certain way to be a good leader.
To sum up, though, some may disagree with my opinions, but I deeply believe that leadership can be gained and its characteristics can be learned. Not only are psychological characteristics achievable but also experience will somehow optimize one's behaviors to act as a good leader. I think researchers should investigate leaders' common characteristics and the methods that yields to them.
- Advantages and disadvantages of buzzing 3
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and examples to support 70
- Genetic modification of trees and its benefits 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...t also experience will somehow optimize ones behaviors to act as a good leader. I th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, well, while, for example, i think, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97894736842 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09283865883 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492105263158 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0201615041 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0952380952 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0952380952 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195867113053 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682325000488 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401140023535 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136470527562 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166924392533 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.