Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others. What types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
Given that mankind will face population explosion and land crisis, whether old buildings should be preserved better or not is an inevitable issue. As for some people, they believe that people should pay more attention to protecting certain old buildings. In my views, old buildings are worth conserving unless they have historical values. The consequence of it unleashes tremendous benefits to the country and their citizens.
Firstly, in terms of culture, they demonstrate cultural deposits of the country. Take the Imperial Palace for example, its abound of antiques which are handed down from the ancestors, including sophisticated handicraftsăprecious calligraphy and painting works. The whole palace symbolizes great part of Chinese culture, and this gives people a feeling of belongings.
From another aspect, historical buildings fulfill the purpose of education. These buildings were constructed centuries ago . It could connect people to the past so that people can gain a better understanding of the history. Additionally, as a kind of building, they have distinctive styles which could give inspiration to architects.
Last but not least, they have economic merits. Generally, based on the cultural and educational edges, they become tourist attractions and appeal to people from all over the world. Undoubtedly, they promote tourist industry of the country. Moreover, they give impetus to other industries. For instance, various restaurants cluster around them. The reason why these restaurants exist and prosper is that historical buildings attract a number of people all year round. It can be said that they play vital roles in promoting economic development.
In conclusion, historical buildings are of great benefits to the country and people.
- The chart shows the different ways of dealing with the garbage in four countries 56
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 50
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV Therefore they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...buildings were constructed centuries ago . It could connect people to the past so ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, moreover, so, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70676691729 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07755796751 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62030075188 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.236596438 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8947368421 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230441190489 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061341842077 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830094713901 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125595529921 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129224248417 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.