The presented maps illustrate the changes that occurred to the road access of a city hospital in 2010 in comparison with 2007.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is clear to see that while the city hospital has remained the same, the roads’ infrastructure was upgraded and developed by building a new public parking lot, roundabouts and a bus station instead of stop.
In details, a new public car park was built, east of the hospital, being split from the staff car park and is relatively wider whereas they were joined back in 2007. Also, two roundabouts were structured opposite to each other through the hospital road, linking the bus station with both, the ring from one side and the city road from the other.
A new bus station was put in place west of the hospital road, replacing the bus stops which appear in the 2007 map on both side of the hospital road. However, the northern part of the ring road has remained unchanged.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 50
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74698795181 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52270859281 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572289156627 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2509426767 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211756396931 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123897417909 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104661219798 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163102738865 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104478835147 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.