Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The environment is endangered and that is a fact. Almost all the scientists agree on the harmful effects of the industrialization, especially on the climate, which is becoming hotter. Some people argue that such big and complex issues cannot be faced by the people, but only by the countries and the big corporations. I strongly disagree with this opinion, because both the governments and the companies are influenced by the individuals.
The influence of the populations is particularly clear when we speak about the governments: nowadays the most part of the countries are characterized by democratic systems, in which the lawmakers who are about to be elected present programs to the public, so the electors can chose the politicians among the most sensitive towards the ecological problems. Moreover, the described mechanism continues even after the elections, because the public opinion and the press can monitor the elected official on a constant basis, and make petitions for new eco-friendly laws and protest against any measures against those purposes, if necessary. For instance, in the United States there was recently a great demonstration against the pollution caused by the oil companies and such an actions leaded the autorities to forbid some dangerous oil research practices, such as the so-called "franking".
It is clear that the power of the people can extend even towards the most powerful corporations. If the masses act united, can change directly the policies of the multinationals even in a direct way. First and foremost, if a company do something against the environment, the consumers can boycott the products in favour of other more eco-friendly corporations. Many studies shows how the consuming of plastic bottled water is decreasing, considering that the public opinion is becoming aware of the damages of the plastic products.
To sum up, I believe that individuals have a lot of power and a positive attitude for more sustainable policies can be enacted only from "the bottom to the top" of the society and not the other way around.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | subodh | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | chioma49 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Mario Nese | 84 | view |
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 11
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot? 73
- Culture is turning similar around the world. What are the reasons ? What are the negative and positive aspects? 84
- Some people believe the aim of university education is to help graduates get better jobs. Others believe there are much wider benefits of university education for both individuals and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 773, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an action' or simply 'actions'?
Suggestion: an action; actions
...on caused by the oil companies and such an actions leaded the autorities to forbid some da...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a direct way" with adverb for "direct"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...the policies of the multinationals even in a direct way. First and foremost, if a company do so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31531531532 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16620208554 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570570570571 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8715941879 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167324787331 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547729840864 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484430083304 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929038216845 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298642589371 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.