The bar graph shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010.
The bar graph compares the changes in property prices in Algeria, China and Argentina from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, the property prices in China displayed a significant increase over the period while in Algeria they decreased dramatically. It is also noticeable that Argentina's property prices fluctuated throughout the period.
In 2007, Algeria had by far the biggest growth rate in property prices at just over 6% and this figure dropped steadily to reach a low of 3% in 2010. In contrast, China's growth rate in property prices started at 2%, which was the smallest figure in 2007, but the number went up continuously year on year to peak at roughly 7% in the final year.
With regard to Argentina, the percentage growth in property prices began at approximately 3%, then rose to nearly 5% in the following year. The figure plummeted significantly to around 1% in 2009, then subsequently grew to about 2.5% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | jenmin | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | harvle | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | Võ Ngân | 61 | view |
- The table below shows key data on demographics of four different countries 21
- The table shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. 56
- The charts below show the numbers of men and women attending four evening classes in a secondary school in Britain and the percentage of these in 5 different age groups. 78
- The graph below shows the participation of children in selected leisure activities in Australia. 73
- The diagrams below show the campus of Riversdale University in 1993 and in 2010 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03225806452 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78515463994 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4871282003 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27978859619 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14061589188 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797459666308 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186089048206 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714950093716 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.