Downtown Zurzi is becoming increasingly congested with traffic, increasing the commuting time for those who work downtown or near downtown. The nearby city of Loft was faced with the same problem several years ago and implemented a small weekly tax for driving one's car downtown, Downtown traffic almost immediately subsided in Loft and the local government also raised much-needed money for fixing the roads elsewhere. obviously, this plan should be implemented in Zurzi in order to solve the brewing traffic congestion problem.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author mentions the state of zurzi and loft traffic congestion in downtown and downtown vicinity. he argues that while the taxation system for entrance to the downtown resolved the loft city traffic jam, the same idea should be implemented in zurzi to subside the downtown traffic. Although the scenario seems plausible at first glance, further investigation and pursuing situations reveal apparent flaws in the write-up.
The infrastructure and population of the cities are not considered to have a better insight about what the author concludes about them. it is claimed that the congestion problem was solved after a small weekly tax in loft, but the argument lacks the evidence to show how the commuters substitute the transport means. If the cities do not have the same infrastructure such as BRT, Monorail, Taxi, Bicycle Lanes, etc. then it is irrational to anticipate an identical outcome from the same solution. people in the loft may start using buses to get to the downtown and the bus services provide agreeable convenient for the users but we have no extra data to check for the zorzi. Moreover, the population of both cities should be considered to assess the travel demand and travel supply in downtown. when there is a significant difference between the population of both cities, then improving the public services and satisfying the travel demands needs different investment and governmental efforts.
The author fails to points out the value of the small tax. using taxation system to avoid people doing something should have preventative aspects. while, for example, 10 dollars a week is small and preventative in loft it may not be preventative to the costs of living in zorzi. Hence, people in zurzi could continue using their own cars and commute to the downtown. For instance, assume that a weekly commute to downtown by the public means of transport is 100 dollars for each person and the weekly tax for private car driving is 50 dollars. therefore, people prefer to use their own cars especially when they travel with more than one person in each car. therefore, the conclusion of the author encounters a significant flaw and he needs to glean more evidence to prove the notion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | farhadmoqimi | 63 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Fatema Humayara | 63 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | Janki thaker | 82 | view |
| 2018-08-28 | A.I. | 29 | view |
| 2018-08-15 | majduleen | 83 | view |
- 51 - integrated - elephants surprising behaviors 81
- TPO52 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- TPO 28 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. Do you agree or disagree? 90
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 15
No. of Words: 367 350
No. of Characters: 1808 1500
No. of Different Words: 185 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.377 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.926 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.646 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 133 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 45.875 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 18.718 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 1 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.424 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.631 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.141 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...tion in downtown and downtown vicinity. he argues that while the taxation system f...
^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...t what the author concludes about them. it is claimed that the congestion problem ...
^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...entical outcome from the same solution. people in the loft may start using buses to ge...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 796, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...l demand and travel supply in downtown. when there is a significant difference betwe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 21, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'point'.
Suggestion: point
...ental efforts. The author fails to points out the value of the small tax. using t...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 60, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Using
... points out the value of the small tax. using taxation system to avoid people doing s...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...thing should have preventative aspects. while, for example, 10 dollars a week is smal...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 545, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... for private car driving is 50 dollars. therefore, people prefer to use their own cars es...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 659, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... with more than one person in each car. therefore, the conclusion of the author encounter...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 367.0 441.139720559 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06811989101 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69723665397 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 204.123752495 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523160762943 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 705.55239521 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6918540941 57.8364921388 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.411764706 119.503703932 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 23.324526521 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.70786347227 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316961964536 0.218282227539 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939393609324 0.0743258471296 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942945876103 0.0701772020484 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219955884617 0.128457276422 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529379932182 0.0628817314937 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.