There has been a remarkable increase in the number of people who believe that in the modern era, people have a lot of options. This essay will delve both sides of this view before drawing a reasonable conclusion. I definitely agree that modern people have more choices and options than previous generations thanks to technological progres and strong economy.
Admittedly, modern people can easily access whatever they want through the Internet and money. Firstly, people have too many opportunities in order to buy something. A good illustration of this is that according to a report published by the New York Times, there were few smart phone models only a decade ago, while today more and more company produce this technology. Secondly, the benefits of economy on wide range of choices should not be underestimated. For instance, citizens who live in developed countries can eat everything thanks to glabalisation. Thus, both the strong economical status and the Internet can create too many options for new generation.
Despite these arguments, the negative implications of this view are often discussed in terms of two key areas, which are undeveloped countries and restricted sources. Altough there are numerous opportunities to purchase anything, some people who live in undeveloped countries cannot buy these owing to their economic situatins. For instance, poor people can neither buy nor rent a luxury car. Furthermore, reason of this situation is not only economy but also restricted sources. Even though a number of measures have been taken to tackle vanishing of cultural diversity, the problem could not be solved yet. For example, in the last century there were too many traditional culture around the world, however, nowadays the most of them vanished due to the gloabalisation. Hence, people ought to be prudent concerning this situation.
In conclusion, it must be said that the decision as to whether today people have too many choices must be taken in the context of the entire society. However, my personal view is that people who live in the globalised world have a lot of options in from food sector to technology.
- Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged to be used by some countries.To what extent is this a positive or negative developme 84
- People are less fit and active nowadays than in the past. What are the reasons for this? What measures can be taken to fix this? 73
- Some psychologists think that the best way to overcome the stress of everyday life is to spend a portion of the day doing absolutely nothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places. What are the serious problems and what measures can be taken to solve this problem. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hnological progres and strong economy. Admittedly, modern people can easily acc...
^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...to glabalisation. Thus, both the strong economical status and the Internet can create too ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be prudent concerning this situation. In conclusion, it must be said that the ...
^^^
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...sion, it must be said that the decision as to whether today people have too many choices must...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20172910663 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84174698308 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561959654179 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2544721051 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.277777778 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217205770956 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067310083745 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473325531454 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138151573498 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219833475171 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.