Some parents buy their children whatever they want for, and allow them whatever they want to do . Is this a good way to raise children.what type of consequences could this type of parenting have for children as they get old.
It is true that children are being provided by their parents with everything which they want for and they do not have any restrictions on their activities as they have affinity to do. I strongly believe that malnourishemeant of children in such type of way is completely inappropriate by parents, as it may have some adverse impact on children's future in later life.
A range of factors explain that allowing children to do everything may lead to get involved in bad company. First of all, parents are considered to be the role models for their children, who tech them about right and wrong things, but without having any restrictions, on their children's things to do whatever they wish, may put them in such environment where they are likely to indulge bad activities. There is common belief that having exercise freedom to children lead to such type of behavior, when they start to take drug and get involved in unlawful activities by mixing with drug addicts and criminals.
However, there would have detrimental impact on children's later life. First and foremost, children are being allured these days by violent media and latest technology, these are preferred in such a way which, so, leads to poor academic performance regardless having any restrictions on them. Another severe ramification is that children may lead a such habit to buy everything, it may be unfeasible for them to get completed everything in their later life, which may result in depression, so this way of raising children has plenty of drastic effects.
To close, in my opinion, providing children everything and allowing them whatever they want is not only lead to a fear of getting involved in bad company, but also may have the threat to children's upcoming future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | Kuwinder singh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Kuwinder singh | 61 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the results of a survey in which undergraduates and postgraduates were asked about the range of books and non print material in their school library Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 44
- The graphs below show the expenditure on health and education, UAE as percentage of GDP and infant mortality and life expectancy. 84
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. 84
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. 84
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil Write a report for university lecture describing the information below 71
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a tech'.
Suggestion: who is a tech
... be the role models for their children, who tech them about right and wrong things, but ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at children may lead a such habit to buy everything, it may be unfeasible for the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, first of all, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00682593857 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78411282667 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515358361775 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6878138538 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.0 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5555555556 20.7667163134 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470991921713 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207718119601 0.084324248473 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100033484115 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318688764696 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841653412346 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a tech'.
Suggestion: who is a tech
... be the role models for their children, who tech them about right and wrong things, but ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at children may lead a such habit to buy everything, it may be unfeasible for the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, first of all, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00682593857 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78411282667 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515358361775 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6878138538 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.0 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5555555556 20.7667163134 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470991921713 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207718119601 0.084324248473 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100033484115 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318688764696 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841653412346 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.