In many countries, people today are living in a "throwaway society", where things are used in a short time and then thrown away. What are its causes. What are its problems.
Phenomenon of "thrownaway societies" has recently become a widespread issue all over the world. This seems to have several major causes and negative outcomes, which will be discussed on this essay.
Talking about possible causes, first of all, such approach of dealing with things might be imposed by producers thereof, always seeking ways to boost their profit. The revenue of companies manufacturing goods is known to be reliant on demand on output of their manufacturing. In this respect, creating stuff of high quality able to last long would have detrimental effect on demand and, in turn, on companies' revenue. Secondly, nowadays, goods. especially electronic devices and appliances, become outmoded in no time on account of extremely fast pace of technology development. Just-manufactured devices, these days, seem to be doomed to become supplanted by more modern ones and thus be disposed of in short time. Finally, society needs great number of affordable goods of moderate quality, which unfortunately become dumped soon. However bitter it might sound, poverty still prevails in numerous countries. Demand for low-quality products in such countries seem to be predominant.
When it comes to the associated problems, growing landfills and, as a result, contamination of the environment appear to be the only possible outcome of the phenomenon. Unfortunately recycling does not seem to be viable option for many societies, which result in goods ending their life in thrash bins. Another problem might be excessive expenditures on same products and resultant blight thereof on the welfare of consumers in general.
All in all, the major causes range from the greed of the producers to poverty of the consumers, which results in serious environmental issues and is able to blight the welfare of the whole nations.
- Some people believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have high-level degreesDo you agree or disagree? 73
- Finding it hard to remember important facts and figures? Improve your memory in 10 weeks with our Memory Course. Places are limited and the course is available for only a short time.Apply in writing to:You see the above advertisement for a course designed 81
- A lot of social problems can be related to teenagers these days. Some feel that this is because parents are not able to spend enough time to take care of their teenage children. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people believe that educational success depends on good teachers. Others think that it depends on the attitude of the students. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- In many countries, people today are living in a "throwaway society", where things are used in a short time and then thrown away. What are its causes. What are its problems. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which will be discussed on this essay. Talking about possible causes, first of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...ental effect on demand and, in turn, on companies revenue. Secondly, nowadays, goods. esp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Especially
...ies revenue. Secondly, nowadays, goods. especially electronic devices and appliances, beco...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, in general, in short, talking about, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45104895105 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04621717748 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625874125874 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7761368123 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.933333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0497061813856 0.244688304435 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.016150450147 0.084324248473 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0161267523693 0.0667982634062 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0241239694946 0.151304729494 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195440298336 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.