Some people think that a law should exist so that young people under 18 cannot be out after the midnight, others think it should not be. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There has been raging debate that young people under 18 should be prohibited to venture out post-midnight. Some experts believe that there should be a strict law for all young people, while some believe otherwise. I personally believe that there should not be any restrictions levied on young people. In this essay, we will argue both the views using examples to demonstrate points and prove arguments.
On the on hand, there is ample evidence that states that young people under 18 should not roam around the city post-midnight. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly, young people under 18 are said to be naïve and hence they tend to fall prey to bad habits like consuming alcohol and drugs when they attend late night parties in night clubs. For example, recent research by Hindustan Times states that cases of young people under 18 years in drunk driving and overdose of drugs has accelerated by 15% over last 2 years. Secondly, young people should not roam post-midnight due to security reasons. To illustrate, CBI of India 2018 report stated that most of kidnapping planning happens post-midnight as the young people are not accompanied by elders or are roaming with friends. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that young people alone by themselves should not be allowed to roam around freely in the night.
On the other hand, many experts debate that putting restrictions on young people is not the solution, but implementing strict laws for offenders is necessary. We are living in a free world where people have a right to move around freely especially young people who are very eager to explore life. Instead of putting restriction on young people, the government should ensure safety of them by implementing strict law for offenders who serve alcohol in parties to people under age of 18 years, increase police surveillance by deploying more cops post-midnight and install camera surveillance on roads, malls and other public areas. For example, an extensive study by Oxford University states that countries like Japan and China has low crime rate as they have strict laws and also they tale measures for safety of their citizen. Thus, it is possible to state beyond doubt that putting restrictions is not the solution.
From the arguments and examples given I firmly believe that it is a fundamental right of every citizen to move around freely in his/her city at any time. By imposing law will only create unrest among people. However, in order to control the crime rate and mishaps, government has a right to impose strict laws and work towards the safety of its citizen.
- A colleague gave you a book which you used for your presentation. Write a letter to your colleague.In your letter, you should say:•what the presentation was about,•why the presentation was important•how the book helped you. 78
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 67
- You are working in an international company write a letter to inform your manager about your resignation In your letter you should thank the company for the opportunity that you joined it tell the reason for your resignation confirm the time you are leavi 91
- With internet improvements, people can share views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased. Is this a good or a bad thing? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps. Are there more advantages than disadvantages to such services? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 436.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98394495413 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59682764225 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509174311927 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2743633846 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.722222222 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333090181532 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119073419928 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908310749248 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202355523704 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122808602378 0.056905535591 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.