The information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication and had some negative and positive effects on individuals’ lives as well as on society.
The importance of changed the ways of mass communication which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion, The substantial influence of this trend has sparkedthe controversy over the potential impect in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will futher elaborate both postive effect of trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant is that modern era many people used gadgets like mobile phone and many other kind of instrument. Electrical gadgets alway time saveing product .For example, nowadays internet is most commen in my nation and easly calling to other person not pay to high cost.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming many people use to fake ID and easly haked facebook and many other apps.
Conclusion, acording
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...controversy over the potential impect in recent years. In my opinion, the former ...
^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rical gadgets alway time saveing product .For example, nowadays internet is most c...
^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...cal gadgets alway time saveing product .For example, nowadays internet is most comm...
^^^
Line 9, column 175, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ut one of the most alarming many people use to fake ID and easly haked facebook and...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, thus, while, for example, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 1207.87684729 77% => OK
No of words: 177.0 242.827586207 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25988700565 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.92707691288 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59679356986 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 139.433497537 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.661016949153 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 379.143842365 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6551724138 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.0581005537 50.4703680194 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.166666667 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.9669160288 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.25397266985 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0658974034316 0.242375264174 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0244643129712 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032394567468 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0330624601935 0.151781067708 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353297432222 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.