Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
The importance of experimental learning can work well in formal education which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that students should experiments in their life. Consequently book cramming is not life long. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that when we experiments in our life we more learn about life. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that book cramming is not good for students. They should avoid this. Besides, experiments makes man perfect. book knowledge is temporary bur experiences life get very successful. Hence, it is apparent why many in favor of this trend
According to the arguments to the aforementioned above , one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of experimental learning can work well in formal education are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-07 | manraj123 | 76 | view |
| 2020-03-07 | manraj123 | 72 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | manraj123 | 45 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | ameliale92 | 85 | view |
| 2018-05-02 | belinapupa | 93 | view |
- Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 85
- the role of library 77
- importance of education. 77
- the importance of public transport 80
- Some people think women should be given equal chances to work and excel in their careers. Others believe that a woman’s role should be limited to taking care of the house and children. Which opinion do you agree with and why? Include specific details an 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...dents should experiments in their life. Consequently book cramming is not life long. Another...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'experiment'
Suggestion: experiment
...al aspect of this trend is that when we experiments in our life we more learn about life. N...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Book
...Besides, experiments makes man perfect. book knowledge is temporary bur experiences ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 55, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he arguments to the aforementioned above , one can reach to a conclusion that the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15879828326 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7882249302 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600858369099 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.7252542201 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4615384615 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183169923144 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598409939632 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581883610336 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122467883168 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464553900079 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.