Nation should suspend government funding for art when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Art as a token of culture and history has always been protected by government, in order to pass on generations. Recently, facing significant numbers of starvation and rising rate of unemployment, scholars proposed that, “nation should suspend government funding for art when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry.” I agree with the proposal.
Some people might argue that art is an important part of culture. Present generation has the responsibility to protect it and inherit to next generations to study the culture and history of the nation. Starvation and poverty are economic issues that happened in every country; it will be fixed without sacrificing funding for art from governments. Overall, the significance of art as an accumulative essence of history and culture surpasses the influences of undergoing starvation and poverty.
Although art is the essence of cultures of a nation that should be well-protected, there is a prefix, which is nation. When a nation is facing significant number of starvation and severe unemployment, impending possibilities of crash is emerging. If government neglects the imminent danger and still indulgently funding art when large amount of people is starving to death, the regime will be toppled, and the art that presents the history and culture will be displayed and exhibited in foreign museums.
At the moribund era of the once glorious Qing Dynasty in China, government funds lots of its nation`s fortune on protecting its art, museums were built at an outrageous rate, such as the Summer Palace, the Palace Museum; while its people were facing severe poverty. The hatred of people to the local regime were escalating in a direct proportion to relentless ground-breaking museums were being built. Finally, economy hits its lowest, and with poverty was so rampant, the crime rates increased; the money spent on funding art, depleted the government treasury. Foreign countries saw the predicament of the crashing pendulum that nation was facing, then invaded China; at the same time, the hatred of citizens have been accumulated for so long and it exploded whiles the invasion of foreign countries. The once grandiose architects and museums were burnt in ashes, the paintings, sculptures and all other art forms were pillaged by both foreign troops and local citizens. Now, Chinese people only can embrace their own essence of Culture in France, England and all the other foreign countries.
Art flourishes the finest when a nation is prosperous the most. The Renaissance originated in Italy during middle age, when Italy was the most prosperous country in Europe; the Art Culmination of China took places in Tang Dynasty and Song Dynasty; these two dynasties were the most powerful and prosperous empires at the time. When poverty line with lots of its nation`s people facing starvation and high unemployment rate, there is no country in the history with blossom of art emerging at the same time.
Art reflects its habitational prosperity. A nation prosperity ensures protection of its heritage art and development of future art; a nation`s poverty guarantees impending dangers to its existing art and there is less chance for developing future art. If a nation could not protect its people from starvation and poverty, let alone its art. Nation should make sure its people`s basic needs being satisfied first, then start to make budget for its art.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-28 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
2020-01-28 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
2020-01-19 | AC1990 | 50 | view |
2020-01-16 | jason123 | 66 | view |
2020-01-12 | renmingliu | 66 | view |
- Nations Should Suspend Government Funding For The Arts 66
- an appealing image has become more important than truth 50
- Nation should suspend government funding for art when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed. 66
- people primarily use the identification of the social groups to define themsleves 66
- Government should offer free of charge to students in college 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, still, then, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2904.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 547.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30895795247 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92480917691 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491773308958 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 903.6 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5127993648 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8636363636 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.59090909091 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333618266319 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106193342399 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900917724385 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201930140979 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100122772921 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 100.480337079 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.