The two pie charts compare and contrast data on the changes in the proportion of voluntary actions involving in six distinct categories in 2008 and 2014.
A closer look at the diagrams highlight the fact that environmental issues and educational problems were participated in the most, whereas health protection was least favored by volunteers.
More specifically, volunteers showed little interests in healthy care movement with the figures of 7% and 8% in 2008 and 2014 respectively. Meanwhile, the number of voluntary works for environmental protection increased with a difference of 8% compared to 10% of that of sport activities over seven consecutive years since 2008. Educational issues, however, could not gain more interest and therefore experienced a downward trend and fell to 7%, starting at 24%. The same situation occurred with art and the other categories, with the same decrease of 6%, both stopped at 9% and 12% in 2014 respectively.
- These days a great number of children prefer spending time on computer games rather than on sports Why is it a negative or positive development 84
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 89
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 Measured in tonnes 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 78
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, therefore, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35099337748 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12303444611 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675496688742 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.9377176042 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164536229615 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796148222183 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879756471736 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965008819232 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688639788796 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.