Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the modern era, all aspects of human's lives are revolutionized by developing the technology and the high speed of the works accelerated life. Hence, these days most of the people face lack of time. It, also, has made a heated debate among the academician that young people do not give enough time to help the community. Although some hold an opposite view toward this claim, some people firmly support this issue. From my perspective, it is completely true and young people are less active in community. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will cogently elaborate on my points of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that nowadays by improving the technology the obsessions of the young people has changed. As a matter of the fact, they are involved in many social or cultural activities or sometimes they spend a lot of time to achieve their goals, hence, they do not have as much as free time to do other activity. To take a personal experience as an example, when I were a child, I and my other cousins tried to meet each other at least every week and had fun with each other. However, these days, all of us are busy and could not see each other albeit we are extremely enthusiastic about it.
Another equally noteworthy point in corroborating this issue is that technology has caused young people relied on social media to communicate with others. Owing to the fact, if someone is absent in social media, he/she will be forgotten. Apart from this, sending messages in the social media has some benefits for them, for example, it is not only cheap but also time-saving. In fact, people see their messages every time that they have free time. Nevertheless, some disagree with me, because social media by providing the perfect condition for economic activity and advertising attracts a plethora of people toward itself. Perhaps at first glance, it turns out true, though, indeed, it makes the people far away from each other. Besides, it is the main reason that young people spend less time to communicate, due to the fact that it provides the interesting hobby for youths.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that without a shadow of a doubt, young people are more inclined to be insulated and keep distance from society. The fundamental reason could be the development of the technology and hectic life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | mucahit11 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | SSN775 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | naziii | 76 | view |
- TPO 20 integrated writing 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 82
- integrated writing TPO 40 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...development of the technology and hectic life.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, apart from, at least, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80147058824 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6270657001 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53431372549 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5552897387 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.105263158 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228355325141 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678217267154 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612852329469 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131923663069 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276196224905 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.