creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas.
It is been suggested that a total freedom, without any government intervention, should be given to creative artists. While I believe in the power of freedom in art creation, I believe a certain level of restrictions should be imposed as well.
The most obvious advantage to allowing freedom to artists would be closely linked to art creativity. When painters, singers or directors are given the freedom to express their ideas freely, they would not worry about being judged or restricted in any aspects, and higher chances are that they would be able to think outside the box and create innovative pieces of art. Also, artists would be more courageous to challenge the status quo and break the tradition when they have free thinking, leading to breakthroughs in the art field. However, such creative thinking and novel works of art would be missed out upon if artists are confined to a wide range of restrictions.
However, an absolute freedom would also have drawbacks and give rise to negative impacts on the public as well as the society. For example, some directors or painters, in order to draw more attention, may involve a huge amount of violence and crimes. If governments do not impose any censorship, some citizens may imitate these violent behaviors, consequently increasing more incidents of crimes in real life. The examples can also be found in music. It is not rare to find children, especially teenagers, considering swearing or bad languages as something cool, if they are inundated with popular songs including these languages. Some songs may also stimulate anti-social emotions in their listeners. So pictures, music or films, as forms of medium, should be given some control for the sake of their potential audiences and the cohesion of the society.
To conclude, even though I believe freedom is vital for creativity generation in the art world, some restrictions are pivotal to ensure the safety and cohesion of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-23 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-22 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | namanpluck | 90 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | InamAli | 84 | view |
- Some people think living in big cities is bad for people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent developments ever will To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The best way for the government to solve traffic congestion is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think it is a positive or negative development？ 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing judged or restricted in any aspects, and higher chances are that they would b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, so, well, while, as for, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1214953271 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7789768474 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573208722741 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0088787553 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27815768441 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949109729999 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759398114013 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167279841027 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781581688326 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.