experiment learning is better than formal learning
The importance of experimental learning which was debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. In my opinion, the former preposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate the positive effects of this trend and thus will lead to logical conclusion.
There are some myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most alarming one is that experimental learning is beneficial because it gives us deep knowledge about theory and concept and also which help to student learn easily and in a collaborative way. Needless to say, all these merits stand in good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that there are some subjects, which we learn with an experiment such as chemistry and physics. Moreover, we can also remember longer with the help of experiments. We can easily solve problems such as concepts and formulas. Additionally, some students can easily explain the ideas through the experiment learning. In addition, weak students are easily learned with experiments.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion the benefits of experimental learning are indeed too great to ignore.
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops . 77
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you agree that the problem outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 85
- environmental problem 77
- some students choose university near to stay at home with families and other students choose university away from family 55
- Some people think that university should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses T what extent do you agree or disagree 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... to logical conclusion. There are some myriad of reason which will further explain th...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a collaborative way" with adverb for "collaborative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... which help to student learn easily and in a collaborative way. Needless to say, all these merits stan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, thus, while, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 206.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31067961165 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86659425393 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 139.433497537 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582524271845 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6761012608 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4545454545 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175084796564 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064342809077 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640374698674 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107669471023 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307191970121 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.