People who read for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching TV. To what extent do you agree?
Since ages, education has been an indispensable part of our life. It’s been long debated that individuals who indulge themselves in the habit of book reading to have good imaginative as well as language skill than those who loves watching television. I completely agree with this as book reading is an active activity whereas television is passive.
To begin with, there is no denying the fact that book reading requires a lot of brain activity. An individual has to use their brain to convert words into visual memory to understand the scene depicted by the writer and all these visuals need to be remembered till the climax to understand the narrative of the writer. This exercise seems to be a piece of cake, but it requires years of practice. It is been observed that most of the people developed their liking toward reading from an early age. Needless to mention, this exercise makes them smarter and sharper their old age too. A study by Oxford University suggests that people who continue to read in their old age have less chances of getting Alzheimer's, Dementia, etc.
Additionally, reading not only strengthen your brain but also strengthen your command over the language. A person needs to understand what a writer is trying to communicate and this is only possible when they understand the language and its structure.
On the other hand, watching a film or a television series does not require higher mental activity as we get to see every in black and white. We have to just sit on a couch and enjoy the show like a cooked meal. The audience does not need to imagine anything and everything is portrayed in the sequence which does not need higher neural activity.
All in all, reading a book has a lot of benefits as it strengthens our imaginative and language skills because a person is actively involved in the activity. Whereas, sitting in front of a television and enjoying the show requires the least mental exercise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-02 | sharmaisha | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-02 | sharmaisha | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-13 | vdrobny | 61 | view |
| 2020-03-04 | 1aja | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | iceber9 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that advertising on TV is useful for viewers while others disagree Discuss both sides and give your opinion 93
- Many parents believe that when their children read book for entertainment, they are just wasting their time, and that they should read only serious, educational books. What is your opinion about this? 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, but not local people. Why this is the case? What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 84
- Employers should give longer holidays to employees to encourage them to do their job well. Do you agree? 84
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities throughout the world involves enormous expenditure. This money would bring more benefits if it was used to provide new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... continue to read in their old age have less chances of getting Alzheimers, Dementia...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, whereas, as to, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84431137725 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65553841159 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553892215569 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5380344515 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196438910907 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574973837292 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843575894745 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104587898956 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760727535017 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.