The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
The table depicts statistics regarding underground transportation including established date, distance covered and passengers it serves in major six cities around the globe.
In general, the railway system in London is the oldest with the longest route while Los Angeles seems to hold the newest position occupying the shorter distance. Likewise, Kyoto has the shortest route that serves a fewer number of passengers amongst all.
With respect to the oldest network, London, established in 1863 has the lengthiest distance of 394 kilometres that serves 775 million passengers in a year. Whereas, Los Angeles, the modern system serving since 2001 has a distance of only 28 kilometres which facilitates 50 million people.
Similarly, the train network of Kyoto has managed to provide a facility to 45 million users after its establishment in 1981. It has a distance of just 11 kilometres. Among all these networks, Tokyo operating after 64 years of London has the route of 155 kilometres have the highest commuters servings of 1927 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-14 | nhatvynguyen711 | view | |
| 2023-05-26 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-04 | tranhien862002 | 100 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | nltnhi2104 | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | tragiang0606 | 56 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 73
- The map below shows the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, regarding, similarly, whereas, while, in general, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38036809816 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76243982881 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631901840491 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4438156553 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899477252493 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426431399036 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624495445523 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664481545176 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684667563761 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.