In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products, such as medicines and clothing. Do you agree or disagree?
Much attention has been drawn to the threatened species which are being exploited for human sake. In order to reverse this detrimental process, one idea would rather everyone consumed vegetarian products than killed animals for their meat.
Advocates of this believe eating vegetable and fruit can lower the extinction rate of many species. Animal food contains protein which is good for human health, but vegetarian products also have various healthy nutritions as well. Supposing a person needs a certain amount of protein, he can get enough of that amount by consuming sources such as chestnut, cashew and soy bean.
However, there are aspects which have not been properly considered. Consuming meat is obviously unavoidable. A small piece of meat can be more nutritious than a big amount of vegetables. People believe vegetables and meat contain the same amount of nutritions as if there are no differences in their price. Organic vegetables sold in supermarkets are notoriously expensive, let alone the net weight of such vegetables to contain an equal content of protein as a slice of meat does.
In spite of that, humans should only consume farm animals like cows, chicken, duck and so on. As for products made of animals such as clothings, their use should be entirely eliminated, if not prohibited by laws. There is no benefit from wearing a coat made from animal skin or owning a wallet with crocodile skin since it’s just a appearance item. Regarding medicines made from animals, especially rhino horns, people believe that rhino horns can cure cancer, but there is no such animal material that can eliminate cancer according to the scientist.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-15 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | mingchou265 | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-09 | hakinguyen | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-09 | hakinguyen | 84 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 89
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of a large extended family Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- The diagram belows show the production of olive oil 61
- Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...ls for their meat. Advocates of this believe eating vegetable and fruit can lower th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...let with crocodile skin since it’s just a appearance item. Regarding medicines ma...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, well, as for, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14760147601 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64163863036 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623616236162 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2256112193 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6428571429 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1333840976 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419810264134 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446858310237 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749567264921 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476000995551 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.