The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of UK's workforce dividing by five main industries between two years, 1841 and 2011. It is clear that all industries were suffered a significant change in employment during the period, especially in services, manufacturing and agriculture/fishing.

In 1841, the number of employees working in services just accounted for a quarter, however, it had jumped dramatically to 81% of total workforce by 2011. By contrast, the two industrial lines, manufacturing and agriculture/fishing, saw a significant decline during the period. Manufacturing industry experienced a decrease from 36% to 9% and agriculture/fish even dropped to 1% from 22% of staffs.

Besides the above fluctuations, the remaining industrial lines had a steadily trend as in both years, they just accounted for under 10% of total employees in the UK. While construction reported a slightly increase by 3%, the workforce of energy/water, however decreased by 2% in 2011.

In conclusion, there was a significant movement in workforce among industries in UK, which the most employees transferred apparently from manufacturing and agriculture/fishing to services during 1841 - 2011.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (33 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('trend') instead of another adjective.
...ons, the remaining industrial lines had a steadily trend as in both years, they just accounted f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... in the UK. While construction reported a slightly increase by 3%, the workforce of energy/water, h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, however, if, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72316384181 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.81730307975 2.65546596893 144% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3808504812 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296968846152 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135961390948 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132240577776 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19570984177 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852235123798 0.0819641961636 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.