For many employers, formal academic qualifications are becoming more important than experience? Why is that? Is it a positive or negative development
In recent years, it is undeniable that academic qualifications are considered a more crucial factor than experience in terms of the recruitment process. Although this trend can be attributed to a whole host of reasons, some feasible solutions should be done to address this due to its negative implications on both society and individuals.
There is a myriad of compelling reasons why academic qualifications are preferred these days, among which the primary one is that it reveals not only academic prowess but also their personalities. Firstly, since university curriculums provide students with in-depth knowledge with the purpose to generate a quality workforce for the labor market, academic qualification holders, especially top achievers, are well-equipped with sufficient specialized knowledge. This means that they are able to devote more to the enterprises compared to other candidates without any degrees. Furthermore, to obtain a degree, it is mandatory for students to exert themselves to rigorous study as the tertiary programs are challenging and demanding. Therefore, these students are usually hard-working and tenacious, thus, their productivity tends to be better.
Although this trend appears attractive, the negative impacts brought about by it on society are becoming more evident. First of all, emphasis on formal degrees may discourage students from developing their interpersonal skills and accumulating hands-on work experience, thus, creates an unskilled workforce. Moreover, if employers have a propensity to recruit applicants based on their degrees, it will be a misleading perspective that people are only required to pass exams to have jobs. A typical example of this case is that in Vietnam, the unemployment rate has been increased among fresh graduates due to their lack of training.
In conclusion, there are various reasons why some employers prefer people with academic qualifications rather than those who only have the life experience or good personalities and I think that it is a negative development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-21 | layla23012003 | 89 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 84
- Cycling is the healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transportation Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons for this What can be done to make cycling more popular 84
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private company To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that the best way to improve road safety would be to increase minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justifiable They believe there are more beneficial ways of spending this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64401294498 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19274648952 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62783171521 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5055396053 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.333333333 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250972552684 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788937941448 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742201001971 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148644584318 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492754694908 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.