Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of effective teaching ways and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that matters of agreeing to study books are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that useful experiences can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, tremendous teaching methods can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of efficient e-books, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of brilliant teachers. Thus, beneficial ramifications of e-libraries are visible.
From a scientific point of view, inefficient experiences can provide the community with negative impacts which are associated with the reality that the demerits of atrocious books are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described useless teaching means. Hence, predicted outcomes of practical courses are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of effective teaching methods far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do advantages of modern educational approaches prove the significance of written sources, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-08-15 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 88
- Increasing the price of fuels is the best way to solve pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 80
- Tourism is good for some less developed countries but also has some disadvantages Discuss 88
- Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition 85
- Do you think students who go to university and pay full fees should earn higher salaries than those who do not go to university 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88584474886 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24918493275 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675799086758 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9067251878 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.181818182 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191943006852 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560582593377 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498860705581 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100455539202 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545537694242 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.