Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read, whereas others believe only printed material should be used. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Although it is sometimes thought that while learning to read children ought to use only online reading materials, others believe that only printed media should be used. In my opinion, I believe that learning through online is more environmental friendly and easier for children.
On the one hand, people consider that when children learn online, it broadens their vision and I agree as unlimited reading material is available online. It also makes learning more interesting and easy for children. For example, children can browse through internet to search for meaning of some words and now-a-days even pronunciation of words is also available online. Furthermore, this media support the nature as there is no need to cut the trees to make papers for printed books which ultimately helps the society to curb the serious issue of global warming and save our diverse ecosystem.
On the other hand, it is often believed that it is better if only printed books is used for learning as all children are not competent to use technological devices for example computers and initially they need to be taught how to use these devices. Another reason to consider is that Children with poor background cannot afford these costly devices, however, government can support education of poor children easily by distributing books to children with gifted backgrounds.
In conclusion, many people might have different views on media to be used for child’s learning, I believe that online media should be preferred to make learning more interesting and healthier environment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-07-13 | Anjanakanal D | 84 | view |
2020-07-13 | urvashi saxena | 89 | view |
2020-07-09 | urvi eva | 89 | view |
2020-05-07 | pushpak | 89 | view |
2020-04-25 | ronak65767 | 84 | view |
- Since most information about culture and history can be found on internet museums are not needed anymore To what extent do you agree 67
- Psychological illness may not be as obvious as physical disabilities or illnesses Nevertheless they are just as disabling in their own way Society however is more accepting of those with physical than psychological illnesses or disabilities the latter bei 61
- Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read whereas others believe only printed material should be used Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Psychological illness may not be as obvious as physical disabilities or illnesses Nevertheless they are just as disabling in their own way Society however is more accepting of those with physical than psychological illnesses or disabilities the latter bei 61
- In recent years many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping Is this a positive or negative development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25896414343 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72120011768 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569721115538 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.87413003 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.666666667 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380147946725 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16171002599 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144334455669 0.0667982634062 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256404201345 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126220941077 0.056905535591 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.