The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Given in the chart is information about visitors' distribution to four different types of tourist attractions in Britain in 1999 recorded by a survey.

A glance at the illustration reveals that visitors to England maily went to theme parks, in which Blackpool Pleasure Beach was mostly visited.

Having a closer look at the pie chart, three quaters of tourists decided to pay their visit to Theme parks and Museum and galleries, with the percentage of 38% and 37% respectively. By contrast, attractions such as Historic houses and monuments were chosen by a small minority ( 16%), only a half of which turned to Wildlife parks and zoos.

Getting to the theme parks part, there were five parks on the list. The most popular among them were Blackpool Pleasure Beach, with about a half visited. Alton towers and Pleasureland, Southport saw almost equal percentage of tourists, at 17% and 16% respectively. Chessington, world of adventure and Legoland, Windsor were of the least choices, with the same figures of 10% recorded for each park.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-19 dorae 78 view
2021-10-30 Yousuf Shimul view
2021-10-18 Kubraguran 61 view
2021-09-09 soomi2209 89 view
2021-09-09 soomi2209 89 view
Essays by user HoangAnh452001 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onuments were chosen by a small minority 16%, only a half of which turned to Wild...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15204678363 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77615834604 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643274853801 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6175430792 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108327918082 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515896020249 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103004832248 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963273463903 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130473001482 0.0819641961636 159% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.