the pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare full-time and part-time learners in terms of their levels of satisfaction with a certain college service’s computer support and available duration.
Overall, the majority of students in both groups gave a positive response to the opening hours. Nevertheless, their views on the IT assistance were radically different.
Turning into detail, in terms of contentment to computer support, full-time learners who were very happy accounted for 54%, followed by an above-30-per-cent figure of people giving a neutral response. By contrast, while 35% of part-time students were quite happy, learners with the highest satisfaction level ranked second with only one fifth. Meanwhile, in comparison to full-time students responding negatively, for whom the figure was 15%, that for part-time counterparts were exactly 3 times higher.
Regarding to the fulfillment with available duration, with 87% and 72%, respectively, positively responding people occupied the biggest proportion in both full-time and part-time categories. Likewise, a discernible difference between two sectors was also witnessed in the rate of people having neutral reports, who accounted for 12% in the former and 23% in the latter. Unlike the above types, full-time and part-time unsatisfied students had similar proportions, with 1% and 5%, correspondingly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | quan12341234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | quan12341234 | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-12 | minh HUP | 78 | view |
- Nowadays sport is becoming a big business with high earning for professional sportsmen and a lot of companies have involved in financially and in other ways What are the advantages and disadvantages 89
- The bar chart shows the number of hours worked by men women per week in Australia in 2007 Summarise information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- There is a belief that supermarkets and manufacturers have a duty to reduce the packaging of products they sell Others argue that consumers must avoid buying products with a lot of packaging Discuss both views of this argument by giving specific examples 89
- In today s world private companies rather than government pay for and conduct most scientific research Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- People continue to commit crimes even after being punished Why does this happen How can crime be prevented 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...ing hours. Nevertheless, their views on the IT assistance were radically different. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85353535354 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18429036555 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621212121212 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0549165489 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.777777778 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235110366089 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106223302161 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868206555602 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147762133437 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750656186473 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.4140731707 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.