Scientist say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
Nowadays, whether we should only speak the same language in communication around the globe has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this trend is not without advantages, the downsides will justify these.
On the one hand, humans are likely to reap a multitude of benefits from the emergence of a global language. First, in terms of education, since globalized language will facilitate the access of a wealth of knowledge, all people can enrich their knowledge once language barriers were removed. For example, an individual can effortlessly study and enhance his acquisition about a wide range of academic fields, such as science, literature, history without any limitation, sharpening his understanding about the world surrounding. Second, as regards economic perspective, the global language potentially promotes economic prosperity. This means that the global language becomes effective in the sense that it enables people easily exchange information without any confusion in the era of industrialization where there are more and more multinationals ceaselessly growing up around the globe
On the other hand, the adoption of the global language also has more disadvantages that should be taken into account. First, linguistic homogeneity can lead to the disappearance of minority languages. In fact, it is not straightforward for a country to eradicate its mother language which has been embedded with historical and cultural values over the prism of time, resulting in the loss of cultural identity of a nation for this process as an unexpected consequence. Second, human will find it hard to create the global language since it takes hundreds of years to get the process of grammar, vocabularies and more done but it offers little return.
In conclusion, the cons of a mutual language will eclipse the pros in terms of a mutual global language for all people. By using multi-languges in this world, humans can reap more benefits rather than harning one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-14 | lynkchillie0911 | 89 | view |
- Writing reading and maths are the three recognized traditional subjects Computer skills should also be the fourth largest branch Do you agree or disagree 89
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to reduce the time children spend watching TV and encourage c 84
- Scientist say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to reduce the time children spend watching TV and encourage c 84
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom Do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, as regards, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37179487179 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05504373814 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.2172240461 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159375292363 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060108184448 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344760526261 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110550743105 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243479416283 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.