Topic 27/6/19: Science finds that by studying the behavior of three-year-old children they can predict if they will grow up to be criminals. To what extent is criminality related to human nature? Is it possible to stop children from being a criminal when they grow up?
It is true that some people can behave disturbingly from an early age. However, in my opinion, not only human nature but upbringing plays a key role in enforcing criminality. Besides, it is not impossible to stop children from committing crimes in their developmental stage.
On the one hand, some young individuals are just born criminals. For instance, some scientists who study the brain of prior offenders, realize that there is a part of these criminals’ brain actively inclined towards violence. This means there is hardly any way to prevent them from juvenile delinquency. Nevertheless, should three-year-olds’ behaviors be researched, it is not guaranteed that criminality can be predicted and avoided since these babies have not reached their full cognitive potential. Thus, I believe that some other youngsters commit felony because of their upbringing and surrounding. This can be attributed to their neglectful or abusive parents or even some traumatic experiences which distort their world views.
On the other hand, there are some actions for educators to help their children stay on the right track in their formative years. Firstly, parents need to create a supportive and comfortable environment which involves educating children social norms and respecting their decisions. For instance, if the caregivers notice any problematic behaviors from their offspring, it is imperative that they clarify to the children what is right and wrong. Additionally, teachers ought to observe and take precautions against strangers that approach their students to protect them from troubles.
To sum up, both nature and nurture are the sources of criminality. However, it requires the cooperative actions of both parents and teachers to make sure that their children grow up to be law-abiding citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-21 | Veejar89 | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-14 | Thu Phuong Dang | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-14 | Thu Phuong Dang | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-04 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 84 | view |
- Topic 06 04 19 People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- Topic 30 6 19 Air travel is causing some problems for the environment therefore we should increase the price to discourage people Others disagree that this is the solution Discuss both views and give your own opinions 84
- Topic 07 06 19 More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Topic 23 5 19 In many cities there is little control on the design and construction of new homes and office buildings and people can build houses in their own style What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a situation 78
- Topic 13 4 19 In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food that can be grown in their local area As a result much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvan 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, even so, for instance, in my opinion, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53405017921 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03831470163 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3019083506 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232653541347 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691275308816 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632609294777 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129731011535 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245375418705 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.