The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
How can we enhance the well-being of a society, abiding with authority's idea or question his/her opinion? In my humble view, it is undeniably true that we should repudiate their ideas once their ideas have been proven false. However, this doesn't mean that everyone is qualified to do so and there exists sufficient time buffer to do so. Furthermore, it is also worth to point out that better feedback channels and disinterested evaluation for ideas from authority could better serve to prompt the welfare of the society as a whole.
To start off, if we want to improve overall status of society, we should encourage learned people to raise questions when finding flaws in authority's idea. Undoubtedly, we shouldn't blindly accept authority's ideas or principles once identifying their potential remiss, because such flaws are more likely to impact a mass of people considering the authority's social influence. On the contrary, it is only through challenging their flaws that we are able to sweep away potential risks of social development and find more suitable alternatives. For supporting example, we can no further go for Galileo's challenge to Aristotle's freefall theory. During Galileo's era, Aristotle's freefall theory that the heavier one of two iron ball thrown aloft will attain faster speed and reach the ground firstly, had already been well established, which lead to distorted ideas about gravity in public and further hindered with development of physics. In order to revise such biased theory, Galileo made his endeavor to undertake the famous experiment in leaning tower of Pisa and finally toppled with it.
However, tenable as such issue holds in most case, I have to contend that not every citizen are competent enough to do so and we might not allow to do so for some extremely splitting-second decision making. With regards to the first place, majority of people might raise questions for authorities merely from their own end, as a result of lacking comprehensive viewpoint for the society as whole. In this case, such narrowed-mind repudiation actually induce more chaos rather than wisdom during our decision-making phase. Additionally, when trapped with urgency, it is usually infeasible for us to collect feedback from the demotic, which could inevitably waste precious processing time and let right chance for settling down issue slip away. How Roosevelt’s New Deal Policy prosecute during the Great Depression well exemplifies my viewpoint. When Roosevelt put forward governmental regulation for economy, there existed a spate of challenges from the capitalists, which questioned the rectitude of such seeming heterodox policy. However, majority of such dissents either merely represented business interests or were impractical to put into effect in a short timeframe. Therefore, in order to guarantee public interest and ameliorate economic situation immediately, Roosevelt had no hesitation to drive such strategy into practice, which has been proven as one of most successful economic policy in U.S history.
Furthermore, the real challenge to effectively dispute authority lies on how to establish a better channel for disagreement collecting and put gleaned ideas under an impartial evaluation system. Given complexity of such topic, this is a question that can't be resolved in such a short response. But a brief summary for two key points could help illustrate my brief ideas for ultimate solution. The first one is to establish diverse channels for the purpose of gleaning different ideas, which could facilitate us to drag into limited viewpoint predetermined by existing authorities. Moreover, it is also necessary to establish more empirical methodology and impartial panel to evaluate the author's idea rather than overemphasizing value of ideas out of who raise it. Expanding the aforementioned Galileo's proof for freefall theory. He made resolution to undertake experiment in public for the sake of receiving more diverse feedback from the public, while theorical proof for his repudiation of Aristotle's supposition has also been given in formal disquisition. In this sense, how Galileo prove rectitude's his own theory well exemplifies two critical points mentioned above, which could be leveraged as general guideline when challenging so-called authorities.
In summary, it is necessary for us to question erroneous ideas from so-called authority. However, as discussed before, people with rare relevant knowledges might inversely invoke more chaos in our society rather than enhancement for general welfare of the public. Additionally, confronted with urgent cases which need immediate decision making, we can't even have time to do so. Furthermore, in order to hone general well-being of the public, both effective feedback channel and evaluation methodology for authority's viewpoint should be established in advance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Siddhant412 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | KruthiHK | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a manufacturing company. "During the past year, workers at our newly opened factory reported 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries. Panoply 66
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 68
- Claim Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public Write a re 66
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 90
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and sup 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... we enhance the well-being of a society, abiding with authoritys idea or question...
^^
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s have been proven false. However, this doesnt mean that everyone is qualified to do s...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...of society, we should encourage learned people to raise questions when finding flaws i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...aws in authoritys idea. Undoubtedly, we shouldnt blindly accept authoritys ideas or prin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 722, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'ball' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'balls'.
Suggestion: balls
...theory that the heavier one of two iron ball thrown aloft will attain faster speed a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
... enough to do so and we might not allow to do so for some extremely splitting-second ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1404, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...of most successful economic policy in U.S history. Furthermore, the real chall...
^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... of such topic, this is a question that cant be resolved in such a short response. B...
^^^^
Line 7, column 689, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ogy and impartial panel to evaluate the authors idea rather than overemphasizing value ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 349, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hich need immediate decision making, we cant even have time to do so. Furthermore, i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, as for, in summary, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 102.0 58.6224719101 174% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4119.0 2235.4752809 184% => OK
No of words: 751.0 442.535393258 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48468708389 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.23491921734 4.55969084622 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9682615412 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 383.0 215.323595506 178% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509986684421 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 1316.7 704.065955056 187% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3398433527 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.3 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0333333333 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18087443229 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526546793549 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382246945307 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117969438203 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274183361898 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 48.8420337079 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 217.0 100.480337079 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.