abcxyv
Nowadays, there are many controversial questions relating to scientific innovation, leading to contradicts among our social. Despite a range of arguments that had been offered by the experts, I strongly believe that this factor play a pivotal role in the development of humankind; therefore it should be encouraged in these days.
First of all, concerning about the societal aspects, our world had witnessed the appearance of a considerable number of cutting-edge technology innovation, making the convenience for the life. In the fact, had it not been for these pioneering achievements, people could have had nothing the progresses as regarded through many centuries. The cities might be disappeared in the perspective from outside of atmosphere in case the lights had not been innovated. Additionally, the industrial revolution 4.0 perhaps be only a main theme of various fiction story with lacking of artificial intelligence, enabling our community to shortage a distance of contacting with each other through electronic device such as smart phone or laptop, as well as allow the systems of manufactory producing a
Turning to the point of medicine, people could not deny the necessity of modern methods and tools in treatment, helping a thousand individuals to fight against the severe diseases. In particular, the DNA combination engineering enabling physicians to apply the immunology therapy to inhibit the spreading of mutated cells or recover the function of genes in oncology patients, devising the suitable curing with any case. Moreover, the scientists had used the medical innovation to defeat the global pandemic in many recent decades like SARS or Ebola.
In general, the advantages of scientific accomplishment are definitely outweighing the drawbacks that those brought to our life. Consequently, these should be encouraged on a global scale by many effective approaches like funding the budget in erecting the laboratories or hubs in some countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-22 | hardyboywwe | 11 | view |
- bar graph and table 11
- The charts below show the percentage of spending on different areas in the average household in one country in 1910 and 1960 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of population in these three diferent age groups in Japan 78
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2003 and 2007
- Many government think that economy progress is their most important goal Some people think that other types of progress are equally important 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'contradict'.
Suggestion: contradict
...ng to scientific innovation, leading to contradicts among our social. Despite a range of a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 786, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w the systems of manufactory producing a Turning to the point of medicine, people...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in general, in particular, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51815181518 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14746645891 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630363036304 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.419073771 49.4020404114 226% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.2 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 50.2224549098 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.