Many men and women are making the decision to have children later in life.
Why is this trend occurring?
What are the impacts of this development?
In recent years, the issue that a growing number of young parents procrastinate parenthood. This is attributed to a whole host of reasons, and some effects, either in positive or negative ways, should be considered.
There are several reasons why couples delay giving birth late. First, since the labor market is getting competitive, young adults tend to devote their time, energy, and money to their careers. In fact, young parents would opt to work more hours with higher commitments in lieu of spending time taking care of their children, which brings greater success or more handsome salaries. Second, by understanding the magnitude of the child-rearing responsibility, they, in turn, are scared of giving birth. For example, taking care of children, either feeding in or soothing babies, is considered as a full-time job, which discourages many would-be parents as they may not have time for taking care of themselves.
There are 2 mains impacts, positive and negative ones, of procrastinating giving birth late on young parents. First, in order to save an adequate amount of money for children raising, parents determine to delay parental hood. In fact, necessities for child-rearing such as milk products, babies’ clothes, or diapers will cost parents a significant amount of money, which implies that parents need more time to prepare. Second, having children late in life could be detrimental to the health of mothers and babies. Plenty of evidence suggests that newborns could be at high risk of severe illnesses such as Down syndrome if mothers decided to give birth in their middle age, which indicates that parents should give careful consideration to this decision.
In conclusion, there are several reasons and effects of delaying parenthood in young generations. By considering all the pros and cons of this issue, would-be parents will make the best decisions not only for themselves but also for their babies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-01 | Tung Linh | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | giaolang | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | Patel Romaa | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-04 | kamalena | 89 | view |
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 73
- The graph below shows the US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services 89
- The three pie charts below show how the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001
- In some cultures children are often told they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25566343042 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79953419918 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582524271845 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5098938783 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.099064860766 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355123783519 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397678883686 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664177515076 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017268575945 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.