It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In the wake of cutting-edge technology, there is a likelihood that travellers and scientists do not find it troublesome in scouting for every innermost corner of the world. Though this prevailing phenomenon is able to reap an array of benefits, I partially comply that its downsides eclipse its merits on various aspects.
On the other hand, there are few reasons to explain why many hold a belief that having a vacation to these deleterious destinations could bring a variety of radical ramifications in human’s life. The first reason is to enhance the profound of professors’ knowledge excessively about the natural world. In fact, thanks to these experiences, scientists are likely to avail it to generate a number of state-of-the-art technologies, which is to lift up people’s life such as inventing tough medicines or treatments by employing their precious experiences. Another fact is tourists who venture into the secluded spots discovering the kamikaze and wonderful rest of the world the most. This is to say that these high-stakes journeys are the greatest chance for them to conquer their limit, vividly conceive a wider visualization of the earth surface and even trigger their curiosity than others.
On the contrary, despite these attractions, its liabilities are always a crippling problem in the world which is the environment of these lands. First and foremost, being able to take its toll on the environment, particularly the animal habitats due to the movement of researchers and travellers. To be more specific, by stealing endangered animals pushed to the brink of extinction, professors would analyse or look for the assets of these animals to offer people’s life or even their private projects. Consequently, the balance of the natural world wrecked and thrown the ecological crisis in disarray. In other words, the surge of tourist is one of the main culprits of provoking these places to be suffered from ecological destruction. For instance, travellers have a tendency to set their foot in these captivating destinations, they may be exposed to insects, chemical disturbances and among others survived on their items, clothes and brought to these places, which exerts detrimental impacts on these lands breaking down the accommodation of valuable animals.
For the advantages and disadvantages cited above, while this trend could bring numerous assets, I concur with the idea of drawbacks will be for more significant.
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime 78
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
- Many sports players advertise sports related products What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...d, there are few reasons to explain why many hold a belief that having a vacation to thes...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, look, may, so, while, for instance, in fact, such as, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36597938144 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10039870036 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603092783505 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7367006224 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.714285714 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118562715618 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039557096524 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375315073158 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784588994268 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223537850062 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.