Nowadays, some students hold bad study habits while they start to enjoy their school life. Therefore, each university or college is willing students to attend the courses to improve good habits. Nevertheless, it is so controvertible for students to take these classes. I surely agree with the idea that students should choose the classes for brushing their bad costumes. They are capable to polish their future visions, establish their quality of life, and absorb diverse ideas from the class which is different from requirements.
To begin with, the future visions of students will be enhanced by taking the course by studying good habits. They do not have enough skills to absorb all materials from school if they have bad norms for their studies. It is a waste of time for them to spend their school because they just make the attendance points. Moreover, they cannot predict that they want to get future jobs and foresight. However, students who study and attend their classes of teaching good manner intrigue and participate in their basic classes. Hence, students will be able to acquire their future sights for their dream.
Secondly, students will boost their quality of life by learning the class of good habits. Some students who already have a bad manner to their study also hold the troubles. They are not able to wake up early morning, communicate with others, and pursue their tasks, and so on. However, once they attend the lessens where teachers repair their attitude of studies, their lifestyle is gradually getting better than before. As a result, they can obtain more friends, have conversations with not only friends but also professors, and increase their worth of life.
Finally, their quantity of knowledge will be built up by the lecture about good study habits. Normal students are obliged to take the required classes for graduating from their university or college. Although the lectures give students the basic knowledge, their thought about life will be regulated and become same as others. Thus, the ideas by students are more diverse if they take the classes made up different contents without requisitions.
To sum up, I definitely believe that students should choose the courses made up teaching good study habits. They can reinforce their future visions, quality of their life, and mass of their wisdom.
- Some people think that some lessons for young children age 4 8 which include video games can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning while others think that these lessons are quite distracting and can be seen as a waste of time What is your op 50
- Nowadays children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phone video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for the children s development 60
- Doing which activity do you think can better help you strengthen the friendship between you and your friend having a good time together with your friend solving your friend s problem with him or her 60
- The company would like to invest in improving employees work Which way do you think is better to help employees become more adept to new technology to redesign the working environment to be more comfortable and spacious 76
- Some people think that some lessons for young children age 4 8 which include video games can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning while others think that these lessons are quite distracting and can be seen as a waste of time What is your op 40
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11979166667 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43437633718 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4921875 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.9066388669 48.9658058833 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.3636363636 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254981512487 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099786247791 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619894607158 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17156509529 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481166970619 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.