A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The question regarding curriculum required to study in college is an intricate one. Some believe a nation should require students to study a national curriculum that mirrors one another until they enter college. However, an identical national curriculum should not be adopted because it hinders those who can otherwise excel in advanced level courses and disrupts the fluidity of teacher individuality.
First, advanced learning students could held back of their potential by the same national curriculum. Take into consideration a 7th grader who is in general math and in other words, he is learning at the level a 7th grader should. But he also understands more complex topics including topics from algebra and geometry. Now, since there is a national curriculum in place, he is not able to move forward and join a more advanced class. Instead he is forced to stay in a class that does not completely challenge his abilities. Because he is not learning challenging enough material to test his capabilities, he may not be able to reach his maxium potential of growth. Moreover, material that deems to be unchallenging for a child can get boring to them and they could lose interest. This disinterest would lead children to not have a desire to engage in activities, which would only further prevent them from reaching their full potential.
Furthermore, having a flexible curriculum allows for teacher individuality. Not all classes are taught exactly the same way as others because they are taught by different individuals. The teachers in the education system have their own style of teaching and incorporating outside materials which would be prevented if there was the same curriculum nationwide. If a nation accepted the idea of the same national curriculum teachers will be forced to teach similar curriculum, which will not allow their individualism to shine. Instead of teaching topics that they think are important and expanding on those specific topics in interesting ways to engage students, they will be handed a pre-planned list of topics and methods to teach materials. This could cause the value of teacher individuality to decrease in value and in turn new incoming teachers that do not possess individualism and an uninterest in teaching all together. The same curriculum could cause a negative impact on the individuality of teachers and impact students who learn in various ways.
Finally, some may argue a nationwide curriculum could aid in closing the gap of inequality because of income statuses. For instance, children that come from low income families do not have the same resources as individuals who come from higher income families. A parent of a child who comes from a low income family may not have the time or materials to teach their child at the same level as a child from a higher income family. Allowing an identical national curriculum will help equalize the opportunities given to every child in the nation. Even though this is true, this will still create an obstacle for those children who do excel at an advanced level and will hold them back from accomplishing at their full potential.
Though believing a nationwide curriculum should be adopted has valid reasons, these claims do not outweigh the opposing side. A national curriculum that mirrors one another will halt the individuality of teachers and the potential of advanced learning students. Thus, a nation should not require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | Siddhant412 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | TiOluwani97 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | TiOluwani97 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 58
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton 50 miles away Moreover relative to population size the diagnosis of stress related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton Acco 54
- The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate Another advantage is that housing costs in 70
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 58
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the President of the Amburg Chamber of Commerce Last October the city of Belleville installed high intensity lighting in its central business district and vandalism there declined almost immediately The city 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'hold'
Suggestion: hold
...First, advanced learning students could held back of their potential by the same nat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...forward and join a more advanced class. Instead he is forced to stay in a class that do...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to challenge'.
Suggestion: to challenge
...s abilities. Because he is not learning challenging enough material to test his capabilitie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, for instance, in general, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2948.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 573.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14485165794 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89258810929 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85152229454 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439790575916 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 937.8 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6295245232 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.384615385 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0384615385 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204222891198 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744004591567 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915508715015 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152408898161 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839388026372 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.