Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now" one big traffic jam".
How true do you think this statement is?
What measures can the government take to discourage people from using their cars?
During the past three decades, there has been a rapid increase in car ownership and the traffic jams have spiked in a lot of cities globally, thus leading to “one big traffic jam”.
In my opinion, I believe that having more cars owned by people is definitely becoming the cause of huge traffic jams in many cities throughout the world and the Government should encourage people to use public transport and educate them about environmental hazards.
Authorities should enhance public transport facilities and accurate timing during rush hours. Hence, increasing more public transport, for instance, increasing the number of buses, trains, and metros to popular destinations and even the frequency during rush hours will encourage people to use public transit. Moreover, the big cities can introduce bike ride facilities and bike lanes which will give people one more way of transportation and reaching faster to their work. Furthermore, constructing proper pedestrian roads and sidewalks will encourage people to walk.
Apart from this, the traffic authorities ought to encourage sharing cars or carpooling by educating people. The Government must educate people about the detrimental effects of carbon dioxide which is released by the cars in the environment and should encourage the innovative methods such as carpooling rather than using individual cars, this will save money and time in the long run and thus, the havoc due to traffic jams. For example, people can share their details on the sharing applications on their cell phones and can share a ride, if they have the same destination or colleagues from the same vicinity can share their cars and can take turns to drive.
In conclusion, traffic can be drastically reduced from the roads in metro cites by improving public transport, and by introducing new methods like sharing a car ride.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-17 | MAHIR VHORA | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-17 | ielts2020 | 73 | view |
- You saw an advert in the newspaper asking for volunteers to help run a charity event Write a letter of application to the organizers In your letter Explain why you are interested in helping Give details suitable past experience Suggest ways you might help 73
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can the government take to discourage people from using their cars 73
- You work for an international company and would like to spend six months working in its head office in another country Write a letter to your manager In your letter Explain why you want to work in the company s head office for six months Say how your work 78
- Some people use social media to keep in touch with other and news events Do you think advantages of this technology outweigh the disadvantages 56
- You have been doing some voluntary work to help your local community However now you are unable to continue doing this work Write a letter to the manager of the organization where you have been working In your letter Describe the work you have been doing 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dewalks will encourage people to walk. Apart from this, the traffic authorities...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, moreover, thus, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27609427609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71132636999 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56228956229 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.1488580372 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.7 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300774938908 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118425568251 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767733929423 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176736704971 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684547281184 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.